wbDesign Wiki
Storybook

Readiness

Dimension Status and evidence
Specification Proposed journey outline from the proposed tender list; roles, fields, and completion remain undecided. [S1]
Figma No Figma creation state or transition is cited or freshly verified.
Local prototype Not implemented. The router has no tender list or creation destination. [S2]
Verification Tracked list spec and router inspected in D-026. No executable creation journey, submission, return path, or persistence is verified. [S1] [S2]

Goal

Proposed design goal: let a user start creating a tender from a tender-list context. The destination and visible completion require design decisions before this becomes a prototype scenario. [S1]

Actor, Trigger, and Preconditions

  • Proposed actor: a user of the tender list; exact role is an open question.
  • Proposed trigger: a create action on screen.tender-list. [S1]
  • Preconditions: not established. Authentication and creation permissions must not be inferred from this outline.

Screens and Routes

  1. screen.tender-list — proposed /tenders; no current local route. [S1] [S2]

A creation destination has not been specified, so no additional screen ID or route is asserted.

Primary CJM

Proposed sequence only:

  1. A user would open the proposed tender list.
  2. The user would choose a create action.
  3. The prototype would show a creation state; modal, page, and panel are still alternatives.
  4. A later design decision would define the fields and a visible completion.

These steps do not imply working submission or production navigation. [S1] [S2]

Branches and Failure Handling

Cancellation, validation errors, draft handling, retries, and access restrictions are open design questions. No draft-save operation, permission rule, or error recovery is established by the current sources.

Cross-Screen Rules

The list is the proposed starting context. Return destination, focus restoration, retained input, refresh behavior, and deep links are undecided; no persistence or session rule is claimed. [S1] [S2]

Completion Criteria

Not defined yet. A proposed prototype could end in a visible completion state, but whether it adds an example row, retains a draft, or returns to the list needs an explicit design decision. No created tender record is currently produced.

Maintenance and Open Questions

Update this flow with screen.tender-list and area.tenders when a design choice is made. Keep proposals separate from verified local interactions.

  • Which role and creation fields should the prototype illustrate?
  • What visible state should count as completion?
  • What should cancellation preserve, and where should focus return?

Documentation Review

Readiness review: D-026 (GitLab task); verified member danil-lebedev / GitLab 8269564; agent codex; session 01a0725e-9ce7-7070-bd66-3b8a92ab9006. This review inspected tracked local sources; it did not re-verify Figma or establish production behavior.

WB Logistics · Design SystemСборка 91da5ae

Поиск по Wiki

Начните вводить название или текст